Can Cal Win State?

Posted by: Tony on Friday, May 2nd, 2008

Coach TaylorCoach Tedford

Does anyone else suspect that the Coach Taylor character on Friday Night Lights (awesome show, great job) is at least partially based on our beloved Coach Jeff Tedford? Consider the evidence: He’s a handsome, 40-something offensive mastermind, known as a quarterbacks guru, runs a pro-style offense with west coast elements, achieves early success as a head coach and is voraciously courted by supposedly more prestigious programs. Aside from the Texas accent, female progeny, and high school setting, Taylor is Tedford. Case closed.

But can Tedford bring Cal what Taylor brought the Dylan Panthers: a state championship? “But wait, Tony,” you say “there is no such thing as a state championship in College football!” I disagree. Every year, Cal pursues what I will call the “California State Championship” – a sweep of U$C, UCLA and Stanfurd. Think about it. If Cal’s goal is the Rose Bowl, doesn’t the path lead straight through those three hated rivals? U$C and UCLA because they are the traditional powers in the conference; Stanfurd because the Big Game is volatile and prone to spoilers. Can you imagine us sweeping the other three Cali schools and not going to the Rose Bowl? Can you imagine us going to the Rose Bowl without sweeping them? History would caution you against such outlier prognostication.

In the modern era, Cal has come painfully close to, and just short of a Rose Bowl berth on several occasions. In each instance, a failure to win the State Championship was crucial, if not fully determinative, in denying us the berth: 2006 (loss to U$C), 2004 (loss to U$C), 2003 (loss to UCLA and Oregon), 1991 (loss to Stanfurd and Washington), 1975 (loss to UCLA). The pattern stretches back into ancient history as well: 1947 (loss to U$C), 1938 (loss to U$C), 1936 (loss to UCLA), 1935 (loss to Stanfurd), 1934 (loss to Stanfurd).

For all the losing streaks ended during the Tedford era (19 straight losses to UDubb, 9 straight losses in Pullman, 7 straight losses at Autzen, 7 straight losses to Stanfurd), Cal still hasn’t managed under Tedford to win the State Championship. So when was the last time Cal won the State Championship anyway? 1958. The same year Cal last went to the Rose Bowl. In fact, since 1933 when Cal’s series with UCLA began, all of Cal’s Rose Bowl berths have occurred in years when we won the State Championship: 1958, 1950 (tied Stanfurd), 1949, 1948, 1937. Meanwhile, Cal has only once won the State Championship without going to the Rose Bowl: 1941, when Cal dominated the in-state field, but finished with a 4-5 record overall.

Now that we’ve established the California State Championship as the crucible of our football being, what hope do we have of winning said championship in the near term? Well, despite the fact that Cal faces some daunting challenges this year, it’s worth noting that our three bigtime rivals are also undergoing their own periods of transition. The last few years have brought us very close to the State Championship several times, and I wouldn’t put it past our Bears to pull it off this year. What do you think?

Go Bears!




Related Articles
    None Found

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
Wow - great connection. I really appreciate how you did the research to back up your claim that "state championship" => Rose Bowl.

I think the 2006 season makes for an interesting case study. Cal, UCLA, and USC were all 2/3 in the "California series". So what criteria does one use for tie breakers? If we use head-to-head matchups, then we still end up with a tie. Cal, UCLA, and USC's one losses were to USC, Cal, and UCLA, respectively. Now consider conference standings. USC and Cal were tied at 7-2, still resulting in a tie. How about total standings? USC beats us out with an 11-2 record versus our 10-3 record, which aligns with their Rose Bowl berth that year.

Anyways, I think an interesting follow-up question to this post is how to determine tie-breakers for the "state championship". Is it possible to come up with a reasonable set of tie-breaker rules for the 2006 season which result in Cal winning state? What does everyone else think?
Reply
Despite last year's result, Cal should continue to dominate Stanford in the near future, as its roster just isn't as talented as Cal's. UCLA looks to get better with Neuheisel and Chow, but their recent struggles in keeping QBs healthy suggests that this may not be their year.

Like most years, I think this season's chances will come down to whether we can beat USC, and this season, I don't like those odds. Could it happen? Sure. But I wouldn't bet on Cal winning more than 8 games this year.
Reply
a2Bear06, you raise an interesting question. I viewed the State Championship purely in terms of sweeping the other schools. But it would be interesting to look into the correlation between the Rose Bowl and who wins the round robin between the Cali schools. I'm sure the many Washington and Oregon Rose Bowl teams weaken any perceptible patterns, but maybe that just speaks to your question about tie-breakers. Overal conference record is an obvious possiblity for tiebreaker. But my guess is that record against Washington and Oregon is probably an even more probative tiebreaker for determining Rose Bowl viability.
Reply
A possible tie breaker could be strength of victory.
Cal manhandled UCLA and USC (although it was close for most of the game) dominated the 4th quarter against Cal. The only close finish of these games was USC-UCLA, so it shows that USC bared down and was in it until the very end. So you could say USC performed the best in the State Championship.

Of course these are all objective criteria, but it's worth noting. Great college teams don't lose decisively. USC has not lost a game by more than a touchdown since 2001.
Reply

Comments by